Cybersecurity

Post LinkedIn lead magnet · Cybersecurity

🤯 AI is BREAKING traditional cybersecurity in ways we aren't ready to fix. I love the show Stranger Things. This concept of "upside down" has got me thinking how AI has made cyber go “upside down”, in at least 3 ways since GenAI became a thing. Let me explain. [1] AI is BREAKING the traditional ways of identification and verification in today’s world. Deepfakes have not only become commoditised, but they are mostly still unregulated and they have blurred entirely the lines between fake and real, fuelling even further enterprise risks like disinformation, electioneering, fraud, etc. [2] AI is BREAKING the boundaries of risk management for businesses. AI is not just any tech. Even without AGI, AI has issues like ethics, biases, etc. Things can go wrong both at the data and the model level. In all my roles building and leading enterprise risk management, two key things my team and I always did... a) integrate threats into the risk management framework and b) integrate tech risk into enterprise risk. No siloed approach. Yet, I still see so many companies have zero idea of what impact their threat landscape has on their enterprise risk, especially when it comes to AI risks. [3] AI is BREAKING the concept of what once meant "insider threat" Agentic misalignment is real. Even if under certain circumstances, an agentic AI going rogue is highly plausible. You don't need to wait for AGI to happen for AI to go rogue. Your insider threat is no longer just a grumpy employee but now also your agentic AI managing your damn workflows that are critical to your business decisions. Add to that, most companies don't even have insider threat as a part of their threat analysis and risk management. While most basics are still valid, in this world of AI, we do need to re-think and re-asses a lot of those "broken" traditional cybersecurity measures. I published my cybersecurity model in 2020, where I predicted that the next waves of cybersecurity adoption will be adaptive and predictive in nature. In the world of AI, it definitely will need to be. As we are ending this year, here's my BOLD prediction for 2026: — We will see way more "predictive" security measures going forward, e.g. AI helping us hunt threats in real-time (independent of sophistication level and despite the non-sophisticated nature of many attacks). This is going to be massive, as most companies still don't understand their threats, and its impact on business risk. — What's your prediction / PoV for 2026 on how AI / cyber is moving? 🚨 Here's YOUR CHANCE. Drop your comments below with your 2026 prediction (YOUR PoV), follow Armis and I’ll pick three WINNERS that will get a cool merch for free. Are you game? UPDATE: This was a very difficult decision with so many insightful PoVs/predictions. The three winners are Jake, Oge and Dr Mike! A big thanks to everyone for being an epic part of my community. Partnered with Armis #cyberthings #artificialintelligence #cybersecurity #leadership

Mécanisme lead magnet

Drop your comments below with your 2026 prediction (YOUR PoV), follow Armis and I’ll pick three WINNERS that will get a cool merch for free.

124 58×1.1

Autres lead magnets en cybersecurity

2

Cybersecurity

Post LinkedIn

Texte

The coffee that broke the rules (and why going viral won’t get you  leads for your cybersecurity company) A former client of mine went viral earlier this year for something completely unexpected. She's a photographer and digital nomad, and she was staying at a hotel where the lobby coffee machine was unplugged. Instead of asking the hotel staff for permission, which she knew would be denied, she just plugged it back in and made herself a cup of coffee. She posted about it, and it was shared. Some people called her a rebel, and suddenly she was doing TV and radio interviews about the incident. It was hard to miss on my feed, but what really caught my attention was that, afterward, when I searched for her work, the viral post didn't help at all. The people who search for "travel or event photographer" never saw it. The algorithm showed it to people who thought rule-breaking was daring, disrespectful, or brave, not to people who needed her services. I see cybersecurity founders falling into the same trap. They'll post something clever that gets tons of engagement, such as a controversial take on return-to-office policies or their thoughts on the latest marketing automation trend. Great numbers, lots of comments. –But the legal teams dealing with GDPR compliance? –Are cyber risk officers worried about incident response? They're not necessarily seeing those posts. My client got famous for a week. But she didn't get booked for any photo shoots. The takeaway: –Viral content gets you likes.  –Targeted content gets you leads. If you're ready to focus on reaching the decision-makers who actually are relevant to your cybersecurity solutions, DM me "rebel" for a free LinkedIn audit.

DM me "rebel" for a free LinkedIn audit.

16 8 0×4.0
3

Cybersecurity

Post LinkedIn

Image

Je vais dire un truc que je n’ai jamais vraiment dit clairement ici. Beaucoup de gens lisent mes posts… et ils pensent qu’ils ont compris ma stratégie : 🤔 ---------------------- Ils se disent : “Ok, il publie. Il crée de l’engagement. Il fait réagir son audience.” Et ça me fait sourire 😄 Parce que je sais bien ce qui se passe dans leur tête. Ils pensent avoir vu le plan. Alors qu’ils n’ont vu que… la surface. ---------------------- Si tu penses que mes posts SONT ma stratégie LinkedIn, tu n’as rien compris à ma stratégie. Je sais, c’est direct. Mais reste une seconde... ---------------------- 1. Tu vois mon visuel dans ton fil d'actualité. 2. Tu cliques sur "voir plus". 3. Tu prends 7 secondes pour lire. 4. Tu vois un “MOI” pour aller plus loin. Et c’est normal : c’est la partie que LinkedIn te montre. La partie publique. ---------------------- Mais ce que tu ne vois pas ? ---------------------- 1. Le mécanisme derrière. 2. Le cheminement ensuite. 3. La manière d'ouvrir les conversations. Le business ne naît jamais dans un post. Il naît dans ce que le post provoque chez très peu de personnes. Et dans la conversation qui suit. ---------------------- Mais ça… LinkedIn ne te le montre pas. Et la plupart pensent que, puisque ça ne se voit pas, ça n’existe pas. ---------------------- Voilà pourquoi beaucoup s’épuisent ici : ils pensent que publier des posts va remplir leur agenda. Alors qu’en réalité : le post n’est qu’un radar. Un premier mouvement. Et c'est là que la majorité se plante. Ils s'arrêtent là où tout commence. ---------------------- Le vrai travail ne se passe pas sur le post. Il se passe après. Là où personne ne regarde. C’est là que tout se joue. C’est ça que j’appelle les Conversations Invisibles. Je ne publie pas pour être vu. Je publie pour repérer. Et ça change tout. Voilà la partie cachée. ---------------------- 📂 Si tu veux la méthode sans t’exposer publiquement (15 min/jour), dis « MOI ».

Si tu veux la méthode sans t’exposer publiquement (15 min/jour), dis « MOI ».

30 71 0×1.6

Demander le retrait de ce post

LinkHub

LinkHub

Attire des clients qualifiés sur LinkedIn avec tes commentaires

LinkPost

LinkPost

Crée du contenu viral sur LinkedIn de façon scientifique

LinkEarn

LinkEarn

Attire des clients en illimité grâce à LinkedIn - sans y passer des heures.

LinkMagnet

LinkMagnet

Distribue tes lead magnets automatiquement sur LinkedIn