Software engineering

Post LinkedIn lead magnet · Software engineering

L'erreur de calcul qui tue les startups avant même qu'elles décollent. Tu veux ton app sur l'App Store et le Play Store. Normal. Mais souvent, tu penses qu'il faut "faire les choses en grand". Alors tu envisages le développement natif. iOS + Android. Deux équipes. Le grand jeu. Faisons les comptes ensemble. Choisir le natif, c'est accepter de payer deux fois : → Deux développeurs (ou deux équipes) → Deux codebases à maintenir → Deux sources de bugs à traquer C'est techniquement "pur". Mais financièrement ? C'est un piège. J'ai construit Evolum, BeeDone, Strive — toutes sur Flutter. Une seule codebase. iOS, Android, Web, macOS, Windows. Résultat : 60% de temps dev économisé. 4.9★ sur l'App Store. 70k€ MRR combiné. L'utilisateur ne voit jamais la différence. Ton compte en banque, lui, la voit très bien. Cette différence de budget a un nom : ton budget marketing. Ne crème pas tout ton cash pour construire l'app. Garde-en pour la vendre. Une app techniquement parfaite sans utilisateurs ? Projet fantôme. Une app pragmatique avec du budget pour la croissance ? Business. C'est exactement ce que je fais chez Builder Créatif : des apps rentables sur des fondations solides. Pas du natif qui double la facture. Pas du no-code qui craque dans 6 mois. Tu veux qu'on regarde ton projet ensemble ? Commente "BUDGET" et on fait le calcul sur ton cas précis. --- Youcef | Builder Créatif MVP 21 jours • Apps qui génèrent pendant que tu dors

Mécanisme lead magnet

Commente "BUDGET" et on fait le calcul sur ton cas précis.

13 4×2.0

Autres lead magnets en software engineering

1

Software engineering

Post LinkedIn

Image

𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗮 𝗳𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲. It's a different category of tool entirely. I spent the weekend mapping the 15 patterns that actually change how I ship code — not the surface-level tricks, but the primitives that collapse hours of work into a single prompt. Here's what the mental model looks like once it clicks: 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿 → CLAUDE. md for persistent project memory → /init to bootstrap it from an existing repo → Agentic search instead of blind grep 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿 → Custom slash commands for team-wide prompts → Skills (SKILL. md) for on-demand domain expertise → Subagents for parallel specialist work → Plugins to install curated bundles with one line 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿 → Plan Mode (Shift+Tab) — review before execute → Hooks for PreToolUse / PostToolUse guardrails → Headless (-p flag) for CI, cron, scripts 𝗖𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿 → MCP servers for Jira, Postgres, GitHub, Linear → Image input for Figma-to-code translation → Git workflows in natural language → Test-driven refactor loops that actually close 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗲 → The full agentic loop: plan → code → test → commit → PR, from one prompt The pattern I see engineers miss most often: They treat Claude Code like a chatbot with file access. One prompt, one answer, repeat. The teams getting leverage treat it like a runtime — with memory (CLAUDE. md), policies (Hooks), reusable capabilities (Skills, Slash Commands), and delegated specialists (Subagents). That shift is what turns 500 lines of boilerplate into one instruction. Dropping the full infographic in the comments. 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿 — 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁, 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹, 𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 — 𝗶𝘀 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄?

Dropping the full infographic in the comments.

742 30 0×2.7
4

Software engineering

Post LinkedIn

Image

Anthropic just shipped Remote Control for Claude Code. (but this open-source alternative was already doing more) Last week, Anthropic launched Remote Control, a way to continue your Claude Code terminal sessions from your phone or browser. It's a great step forward. But it has some limits: ↳ Max plan only ($100-200/mo), Pro support coming soon ↳ One remote session per Claude Code instance ↳ No automation, no webhooks, no scheduled tasks ↳ Your laptop needs to stay awake (or the session pauses) If all you need is mobile access to a running session, Remote Control nails it. But if you want a full agentic coding environment over chat with built-in automation, there's an open-source Telegram bot that goes further. Claude Code Telegram Bot connects Telegram directly to Claude Code. Here's what it adds beyond Remote Control: 1) Event-driven automation - GitHub webhooks route push events, PRs, and issues through Claude for automated review. - Cron-based scheduling lets you run recurring tasks like daily code health checks. 2) Multi-user access control - Whitelist-based authentication per Telegram user ID. - Per-user cost tracking and spending limits. - Rate limiting with token bucket algorithm. 3) Two interaction modes - Agentic mode (default): talk naturally, no commands needed. - Classic mode: 13 terminal-like commands with inline keyboards, session export, and directory navigation. 4) Production-grade security - Directory sandboxing with path traversal prevention. - Webhook HMAC-SHA256 verification. - Full audit logging of every user action. 5) Works on any plan - No Max subscription required. - MIT licensed. Run it locally on your own infra. The setup is four environment variables and a single command. Remote Control is the right call for quick mobile check-ins on a running session. This bot is for teams and developers who want persistent, automated, multi-user access to Claude Code from anywhere. Different tools for different workflows. Both worth knowing about. I have shared the GitHub repo in the comments! I'm Shrey Shah & I teach AI assisted coding and agents.

I have shared the GitHub repo in the comments!

41 19 0×1.8

Demander le retrait de ce post

LinkHub

LinkHub

Attire des clients qualifiés sur LinkedIn avec tes commentaires

LinkPost

LinkPost

Crée du contenu viral sur LinkedIn de façon scientifique

LinkEarn

LinkEarn

Attire des clients en illimité grâce à LinkedIn - sans y passer des heures.

LinkMagnet

LinkMagnet

Distribue tes lead magnets automatiquement sur LinkedIn