Software development

Post LinkedIn lead magnet · Cloud computing

Grâce à cette conf Anthropic j’ai découvert un plugin qui divise par 3 tes coûts tokens. 19,5k ⭐ sur GitHub . 100% open source. Le créateur était sur place. Le mec est smart. Ça s’appelle rtk (Rust Token Killer). Et Bravo au créateur Patrick SZYMKOWIAK ! Le principe → Tu codes avec Claude Code. À chaque git status, cat, cargo test, npm test… Claude bouffe des milliers de tokens en output brut. rtk s’installe en 1 ligne. Il intercepte les commandes shell. Il filtre, groupe, déduplique avant que Claude voie quoi que ce soit. Résultat sur une session de 30 min → → ~118 000 tokens sans rtk → ~23 900 tokens avec rtk → -80% en moyenne Ce qui est rewrité automatiquement → → git status / diff / log / push (-80 à -92%) → cargo test / npm test / pytest (-90%) → ls / cat / grep / find (-70 à -80%) → docker ps / kubectl logs (-80%) → aws / gh / tsc / eslint… Tu installes : brew install rtk rtk init -g Tu redémarres Claude Code. C’est fini. Un binaire Rust. Zéro dépendance. <10ms d’overhead. Si tu utilises Claude Code tous les jours, c’est non négociable. ( Commente “RTK” et je t’envoie le repo! ) Merci à Vincent Bully Bully pour l’invit ! 😎

Mécanisme lead magnet

Commente “RTK” et je t’envoie le repo!

27 45×1.1

Autres lead magnets en cloud computing

2

Software development

Post LinkedIn

Image

I built the same app with 4 AI's. Who built it best? Here are the results. The test: Build a client management dashboard for a digital agency. Using the exact same prompt for each. Ranking based on: > UI/Design > Logic & Functionality > Backend/Database > Ease of Use Let's break it down: Tool 1: Bolt ⏱️ Time: 10-15 min (slower) 🎨 Design: 6.5/10 - Basic, but functional ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Everything worked 🗄️ Backend: 8/10 - Seamless Supabase integration, built-in security scanner 🧭 Ease of use: 7.5/10 Solid all-around. Nothing flashy, nothing broken. Tool 2: Base44 ⏱️ Time: Few minutes 🎨 Design: 6.5/10 - Very "vibe coded" looking ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Did the job 🗄️ Backend: 8/10 - Auto-built Google auth which was nice 🧭 Ease of use: 6.5/10 - UI feels clunky The underdog. Works, but feels like it's playing catch-up on polish. Tool 3: Replit ⏱️ Time: 20-30 min 🎨 Design: 7.5/10 - Actually tried to match the reference ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Standard 🗄️ Backend: 6/10 - Confusing, hard to navigate 🧭 Ease of use: 3/10 One prompt and I hit usage limits. Couldn't even continue building. Brutal experience. Tool 4: Lovable ⏱️ Time: ~5 min (fastest) 🎨 Design: 7/10 - Cleanest, most polished ⚙️ Logic: 7.5/10 - Smart intuition (reminded me to create clients before projects) 🗄️Backend: 8/10 - Seamless with options 🧭 Ease of use: 9/10 Just works. Everything feels intuitive. Final rankings: 🥇 Lovable - Best overall experience 🥈 Bolt - Reliable second 🥉 Base44 - Needs polish 4️⃣ Replit - Stuck in no-man's land The truth? They're all using the same AI models. The difference is UX. Key takeaway: These tools live or die by ease of use. Replit is caught between "dev tool" and "no-code" - serving neither well. For non-technical builders: Lovable or Bolt. For technical folks: Just use Cursor. Full video breakdown on my channel. Comment "Ranking" for the link, or search on YT.

Comment "Ranking" for the link

1.9k 366 0×10.0

Demander le retrait de ce post

LinkHub

LinkHub

Attire des clients qualifiés sur LinkedIn avec tes commentaires

LinkPost

LinkPost

Crée du contenu viral sur LinkedIn de façon scientifique

LinkEarn

LinkEarn

Attire des clients en illimité grâce à LinkedIn - sans y passer des heures.

LinkMagnet

LinkMagnet

Distribue tes lead magnets automatiquement sur LinkedIn