Product development

Post LinkedIn lead magnet ยท Product development

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ'๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—”๐—œ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€, ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ. ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—น๐˜†. ๐—ข๐—ป ๐—ฎ ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฝ. ๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฝ๐—ต runs on Amp Code and does something wild: โ†’ Takes your PRD โ†’ Breaks it into atomic stories โ†’ Ships them one by one autonomously โ†’ Fresh AI instance each iteration (memory via git + progress.txt) ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: Tools like ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ฒ; ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜. Makes sense for most devs today. But ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด-๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐˜€ like Ralph are the future for advanced users. ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜… ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด-๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ๐˜€. The pattern is emerging. The key: ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€. Not "build the dashboard" but "add filter dropdown to user list." ๐—˜๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜„. ๐— ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ: This is where coding is heading. Two paths: ย โ€ข ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜€ (๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ) - safe, collaborative, human-in-loop ย โ€ข ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ (Ralph/Codex) - ship while you sleep, review PRs later Both valid. Different use cases. The autonomous pattern ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ for power users who have: ย โ€ข Solid test coverage ย โ€ข Good CI/CD pipeline ย โ€ข Ability to write clear PRDs Ralph proves the pattern works. Amp Code makes it real. ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ "๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด" ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€. Link of Github in first comment ๐Ÿ‘‡ If this helped clarify where ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด, share it with someone building real products ๐Ÿ” Follow Dhruv Bansal for practical insights on AI development tools and emerging patterns.

Mรฉcanisme lead magnet

Link of Github in first comment ๐Ÿ‘‡

228 53ร—1.2

Autres lead magnets en product development

1

Product development

Post LinkedIn

Image

๐—”๐—œ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ต๐˜†๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ. That is what I told myself when I first started working on AI products. Turns out, I had no idea what an AI PM really did. After spending years watching world-class AI PMs, building AI products at scale, making 100s of bad decisions, I have a much better definition of the role. But, sadly, even today, most PMs trying to work on AI are in the same boat: confused and clueless about "what does an AI PM actually do." Here's the simplest mental model to think of an AI PM's role: An AI PM is responsible for finding answers to these 7 questions. 1. What problem should we solve to maximize impact? 2. Does this need AI? 3. Do we have the right data? 4. How do we turn data into something useful? 5. How will users experience it? 6. How do we know it works before launch? 7. How do we keep making it better? Let's understand in detail: ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—บ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—น๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ The problem must be specific, validated with real users, and solution-agnostic. If you get this wrong, the model does not matter. ๐——๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—”๐—œ This is the most important question an AI PM asks. And the answer is usually no. Saying no to AI when the situation does not call for it is not a failure. It is the job. ๐——๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ "We have data" is not a strategy. An explicit data plan that includes what data we need, what we have, and what is missing is the right strategy. AI is only as good as the data behind it. ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น Simple prompt, ML model, RAG, or agents. Each has a different use case, cost profile, and failure modes. The PM who skips this hands those decisions to engineering. ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ Users need trust, control, and recovery. Design for when the AI fails, not only for when it works. ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—ธ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต There is no binary pass/fail. Build an eval framework. Define good, bad, and edge cases. Ship only when the product clears your threshold. ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต AI products degrade in production if you stop watching them. Sample live conversations. Add new failure modes to your test set. Never stop monitoring. -- Want more details? I just published a full document covering everything I know about AI Product Management--the role, mental models, the mistakes I made and much more. Linked in the comments. Free. No email required, no paywall. I will keep it updated as the field evolves.

Linked in the comments.

743 37 0ร—8.3
2

Product development

Post LinkedIn

Image

Most people think Claude code only needs good prompting. Unfortunately, that is not true. The real unlock is giving it a structure that is coherent and can last from start to end. If there is no structure, Claude code is just another LLM If there is proper structure, Claude code is the smartest engineer on the planet. Here are the 6 files you should include for every AI-assisted build: #๐Ÿญ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—— This is your master plan. What you're building, who it's for, what good output looks like. Created once. Iterated rarely, only if absolutely necessary. The LLM refers to it after very major milestone for context, so it doesn't guess your intent. #๐Ÿฎ ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด This is the product's blueprint. User flows, screens, navigation, system diagrams. It defines all the details and the structure so the LLM doesn't invent pages you never asked for. #๐Ÿฏ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ๐˜€ This is the to-do list. Milestones and tasks with checkboxes. The LLM reads this to know what's done and what to build next. Updated every session. This helps the LLM know exactly what is done and what is pending, so you don't have to remind it. #๐Ÿฐ ๐—ž๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ (๐—œ ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ[.]๐—บ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€) This your product's soul. Limit to 300-500 words. Include one-paragraph product summary, tech stack, design preferences, "never do" list. The LLM reads it before every action. When context gets lost in a long session, this file is what keeps it on track. It ensures that every action is taken in the right direction. #๐Ÿฑ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ Your learning log. It incldues every critical decision, every tradeoff, every "we went with X because Y." It logs what you decided to do and why, so you can refer back reflect / learn from your decisions and get better every time. This is the only file that's ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ, not the LLM. This is what makes you a better AI builder. #๐Ÿฒ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† This your product's long-term memory. It includes critical context that must survive across sessions. Bugs that were fixed, patterns that worked, things that broke. Claude Code reads this so it never repeats a mistake or forgets a lesson you already paid for. Knowledge tells it who your product is. Memory tells it what your product has been through. -- This is the shift you need to make. Prompting is necessary. But it is not enough. Aim to create a structure that AI understands Once you do that, Claude automatically becomes the best collaborater and executes like a high performing engineering team. Reply "structure" and I will create a detailed post on each of the 6 files with real examples and snippets.

Reply "structure" and I will create a detailed post on each of the 6 files with real examples and snippets.

520 81 0ร—5.8

Demander le retrait de ce post

LinkHub

LinkHub

Attire des clients qualifiรฉs sur LinkedIn avec tes commentaires

LinkPost

LinkPost

Crรฉe du contenu viral sur LinkedIn de faรงon scientifique

LinkEarn

LinkEarn

Attire des clients en illimitรฉ grรขce ร  LinkedIn - sans y passer des heures.

LinkMagnet

LinkMagnet

Distribue tes lead magnets automatiquement sur LinkedIn