Software development

Post LinkedIn lead magnet · Software development

I made a 200+ page slideshow in Lovable. It has replaced Google Slides for pitch decks. Here's my workflow. Most founders spend hours tweaking slide layouts. Adjusting fonts. Fighting with alignment. I now build decks directly in Lovable. One prompt. Full-screen animated presentation. Shareable as a link. It's not a slide deck—it's a React app where each slide is a full-screen view. What that unlocks: • Smooth transitions with Framer Motion • Responsive layouts (no more "does this work on a projector?") • Interactive components—tabs, charts, even calculators • Keyboard navigation built in • Publish instantly as a URL If your deck looks like a website, it gets shared like a website. The workflow I use: 𝟭. 𝗦𝗸𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 Generate navigation + placeholders. Test arrow keys and progress dots before adding content. 𝟮. 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀 1-2 slides at a time. Pin versions after each batch so you don't break what's already working. 𝟯. 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗩𝗶𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁 Spacing, fonts, alignment—all without burning credits or breaking navigation. The starting prompt: Ask for a web-based slide deck with full-screen slides (100vw x 100vh), keyboard navigation, bottom progress dots, and transitions under 0.4s. Drop in a design reference from Dribbble. Lovable matches the style automatically. For founders pitching investors or anyone doing B2B presentations—worth trying. Comment "Deck" and I'll send you the full prompt library.

Mécanisme lead magnet

Comment "Deck" and I'll send you the full prompt library.

743 1489×3.9

Autres lead magnets en software development

2

Software development

Post LinkedIn

Image

I built the same app with 4 AI's. Who built it best? Here are the results. The test: Build a client management dashboard for a digital agency. Using the exact same prompt for each. Ranking based on: > UI/Design > Logic & Functionality > Backend/Database > Ease of Use Let's break it down: Tool 1: Bolt ⏱️ Time: 10-15 min (slower) 🎨 Design: 6.5/10 - Basic, but functional ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Everything worked 🗄️ Backend: 8/10 - Seamless Supabase integration, built-in security scanner 🧭 Ease of use: 7.5/10 Solid all-around. Nothing flashy, nothing broken. Tool 2: Base44 ⏱️ Time: Few minutes 🎨 Design: 6.5/10 - Very "vibe coded" looking ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Did the job 🗄️ Backend: 8/10 - Auto-built Google auth which was nice 🧭 Ease of use: 6.5/10 - UI feels clunky The underdog. Works, but feels like it's playing catch-up on polish. Tool 3: Replit ⏱️ Time: 20-30 min 🎨 Design: 7.5/10 - Actually tried to match the reference ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Standard 🗄️ Backend: 6/10 - Confusing, hard to navigate 🧭 Ease of use: 3/10 One prompt and I hit usage limits. Couldn't even continue building. Brutal experience. Tool 4: Lovable ⏱️ Time: ~5 min (fastest) 🎨 Design: 7/10 - Cleanest, most polished ⚙️ Logic: 7.5/10 - Smart intuition (reminded me to create clients before projects) 🗄️Backend: 8/10 - Seamless with options 🧭 Ease of use: 9/10 Just works. Everything feels intuitive. Final rankings: 🥇 Lovable - Best overall experience 🥈 Bolt - Reliable second 🥉 Base44 - Needs polish 4️⃣ Replit - Stuck in no-man's land The truth? They're all using the same AI models. The difference is UX. Key takeaway: These tools live or die by ease of use. Replit is caught between "dev tool" and "no-code" - serving neither well. For non-technical builders: Lovable or Bolt. For technical folks: Just use Cursor. Full video breakdown on my channel. Comment "Ranking" for the link, or search on YT.

Comment "Ranking" for the link

1.9k 366 0×10.0

Demander le retrait de ce post

LinkHub

LinkHub

Attire des clients qualifiés sur LinkedIn avec tes commentaires

LinkPost

LinkPost

Crée du contenu viral sur LinkedIn de façon scientifique

LinkEarn

LinkEarn

Attire des clients en illimité grâce à LinkedIn - sans y passer des heures.

LinkMagnet

LinkMagnet

Distribue tes lead magnets automatiquement sur LinkedIn