Lead magnet LinkedIn — LinkedIn creator

LinkedIn creator

Post LinkedIn lead magnet · Payment processing

The most expensive employee in your company doesn't exist on payroll. It's the process no one owns. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜 𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴: - Invoices that wait for "someone" to approve - Onboarding steps that depend on "checking in" - Reports compiled manually every Monday morning - Tasks that fall through because "I thought you were handling it" No single person is failing. The system is. When ownership is unclear, everything slows down. When steps aren't defined, nothing moves predictably. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀: When a lead comes in → it auto-routes to the right person When a document needs approval → it pings the approver with a deadline When onboarding starts → every stakeholder gets their checklist No "someone should handle this." Clear owners. Clear steps. Clear systems. One client fixed their deal approval process last month. Average approval time: 4.5 days → 6 hours. Same approvers. Same criteria. Different system. Which process in your company has no clear owner? Drop it in the comments - I'll tell you the 3 ways companies typically fix it.

Mécanisme lead magnet

Drop it in the comments - I'll tell you the 3 ways companies typically fix it.

Livre ton lead magnet automatiquement

Autres lead magnets en payment processing

LinkedIn creator

Post LinkedIn

Image

Everyone's adding AI agents. Most are just automating chaos faster. What I keep seeing: Company reads about AI. Gets excited. Implements fast. They add: • A chatbot • An AI assistant • An "intelligent agent" Six weeks later, the CEO asks: "Is this thing even working?" Nobody knows. Because underneath the AI: ✗ No clear workflow ✗ No defined handoffs ✗ No escalation logic ✗ No success criteria The AI does... something. Probably. Here's what nobody tells you: AI doesn't fix broken processes. It amplifies what already exists. • Good process + AI = 10x results • No process + AI = expensive chaos I saw this last quarter: Company A: Added AI to clean workflow → Support resolution time: 4 hours to 23 minutes Company B: Added AI to messy workflow → Customer complaints up 40% Same AI tool. Different foundations. The question isn't "should we add AI?" It's "do we have a system worth augmenting?" Map the process first. Then decide where AI actually helps. Running AI without a process beneath it? I built an audit framework - takes 45 minutes, shows you exactly where AI helps (and where it hurts). Tested with 28 companies. Average finding: 60% of planned AI implementations would have made things worse. Want to run it on your ops? Comment "AUDIT" below → I'll send the framework.

Comment "AUDIT" below → I'll send the framework.

LinkedIn creator

Post LinkedIn

Image

Before your next automation project, answer this: "What happens when it breaks?" Because it will break. 𝗟𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗵: A client's invoice automation stopped sending payment reminders. They didn't know for 11 days. $43K in delayed payments. The automation worked perfectly... until their payment processor changed one field name in their API. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗻: Every automation needs three things: • Error alerts - Someone gets notified immediately when it fails • Fallback logic - What happens if step 3 doesn't work? • Manual override - How do you bypass it in an emergency? Automation without monitoring isn't efficient. It's a liability. Before you automate your next process, run through the 7-question diagnostic. They'll save you from building something that fails silently. Want the framework? Comment "DIAGNOSTIC" below and I'll send it over.

Want the framework? Comment "DIAGNOSTIC" below and I'll send it over.

LinkedIn creator

Post LinkedIn

Image

I spent 2 unpaid hours writing 3 sample emails for a prospect I'd never met. It turned into $100k. Here's how it happened: A friend messaged me saying someone I really looked up to needed a ghostwriter. Not for LinkedIn posts (my usual thing). But for other serious writing projects. I would've been an idiot to say no. I got the email intro on a Sunday morning. Instead of responding immediately, I sat down and wrote 3 sample emails in the prospect's voice. Took me 2 hours. Made them as good as I possibly could. Then I sent an email that basically said: "Pleasure to meet you. I imagine you've got a high quality bar and limited time. My goal is to earn your trust on quality and save you time. I wrote 3 sample emails based on your past content. You can see them here." Next thing I know: "Read your emails. They're good. Let's talk." We hopped on a call. They told me the only reason they booked was because the emails surprised them with how much they sounded like the prospect. After the call, I proposed a big project and spent 20 hours on it. No promise of payment. Not a lot of context. Just made it happen. They loved it. I offered to continue with another project. Didn't hear back for two weeks. Finally they responded and said they didn't feel good about sending me more work without paying me. So I put together a proposal: 10 projects for $100k. They accepted. And then referred more business to me because I crushed it for them. I've landed 5-10 clients this way. Each worth tens of thousands of dollars. I call it the Trojan Horse Offer. Here's the framework: 1. Pick something your ideal prospects have a problem with 2. Pick something that requires little of them 3. Pick something that's easy for you to do but hard for them If the work is bad, they don't respond. If it's good, they try it out. When they get better results, they DM me. Leads to a sales convo. Leads to retainer clients. This isn't my #1 client acquisition strategy. But it's the one I deploy anytime there's someone I REALLY want to work with. And it works. PS - want the full strategy breakdown? Comment “prompt” and I’ll send it to you.

Comment “prompt” and I’ll send it to you.

Demander le retrait de ce post