Software development

Post LinkedIn lead magnet · Software development

The creator of Claude Code just shared his entire workflow. And it's nothing like how 99% of developers use it. I spent 2 hours breaking down Boris Cherny's setup. Here's what shocked me: He runs 15 Claude instances simultaneously. 5 terminals + 10 web agents working in parallel. While most people struggle with one session, he's building 15 features at once without slowing his machine. His most controversial take? Uses Opus 4.5 for everything. Not Sonnet. The biggest, "slowest" model. Why? "It's actually faster because you steer it less and it's better at tool use." Coming from the guy who built Claude Code, that hits different. Three things that 3x his productivity: 1. Plan Mode obsession - Goes back and forth multiple times before executing. Most apps built in one shot because plans are that detailed. 2. Overnight agents - Starts coding sessions from his phone before bed. Wakes up to completed features ready for review. 3. Verification loops - Gives Claude ways to verify its own work. This alone produces 2-3x better results. His team has a shared CLAUDE.md that gets updated multiple times per week. Every mistake Claude makes gets documented so it never happens again. That's compounding engineering. I've compiled all 13 steps into a 22-page breakdown with his exact commands, configurations, and implementation strategies. Comment "CC" and I'll send it to you. (make sure we're connected)

Mécanisme lead magnet

Comment "CC" and I'll send it to you.

12 4×1.7

Autres lead magnets en software development

2

Software development

Post LinkedIn

Image

I built the same app with 4 AI's. Who built it best? Here are the results. The test: Build a client management dashboard for a digital agency. Using the exact same prompt for each. Ranking based on: > UI/Design > Logic & Functionality > Backend/Database > Ease of Use Let's break it down: Tool 1: Bolt ⏱️ Time: 10-15 min (slower) 🎨 Design: 6.5/10 - Basic, but functional ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Everything worked 🗄️ Backend: 8/10 - Seamless Supabase integration, built-in security scanner 🧭 Ease of use: 7.5/10 Solid all-around. Nothing flashy, nothing broken. Tool 2: Base44 ⏱️ Time: Few minutes 🎨 Design: 6.5/10 - Very "vibe coded" looking ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Did the job 🗄️ Backend: 8/10 - Auto-built Google auth which was nice 🧭 Ease of use: 6.5/10 - UI feels clunky The underdog. Works, but feels like it's playing catch-up on polish. Tool 3: Replit ⏱️ Time: 20-30 min 🎨 Design: 7.5/10 - Actually tried to match the reference ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Standard 🗄️ Backend: 6/10 - Confusing, hard to navigate 🧭 Ease of use: 3/10 One prompt and I hit usage limits. Couldn't even continue building. Brutal experience. Tool 4: Lovable ⏱️ Time: ~5 min (fastest) 🎨 Design: 7/10 - Cleanest, most polished ⚙️ Logic: 7.5/10 - Smart intuition (reminded me to create clients before projects) 🗄️Backend: 8/10 - Seamless with options 🧭 Ease of use: 9/10 Just works. Everything feels intuitive. Final rankings: 🥇 Lovable - Best overall experience 🥈 Bolt - Reliable second 🥉 Base44 - Needs polish 4️⃣ Replit - Stuck in no-man's land The truth? They're all using the same AI models. The difference is UX. Key takeaway: These tools live or die by ease of use. Replit is caught between "dev tool" and "no-code" - serving neither well. For non-technical builders: Lovable or Bolt. For technical folks: Just use Cursor. Full video breakdown on my channel. Comment "Ranking" for the link, or search on YT.

Comment "Ranking" for the link

1.9k 366 0×10.0

Demander le retrait de ce post

LinkHub

LinkHub

Attire des clients qualifiés sur LinkedIn avec tes commentaires

LinkPost

LinkPost

Crée du contenu viral sur LinkedIn de façon scientifique

LinkEarn

LinkEarn

Attire des clients en illimité grâce à LinkedIn - sans y passer des heures.

LinkMagnet

LinkMagnet

Distribue tes lead magnets automatiquement sur LinkedIn