Lead magnet LinkedIn — Software development

Software development

Post LinkedIn lead magnet · Claude

🚨 BREAKING : Anthropic just dropped Agent Teams Now you can run multiple Claude agents in parallel with ZERO setup ! 2 weeks ago, developers found this fully built in Claude Code's binary Hidden. Feature-flagged off. Ready to ship. 2 days ago, Anthropic made it official ! 📌 Here's what just became possible : Multiple Claude instances now work together on your codebase → Lead agent coordinates → Teammates work independently → Each has its own context window → They message each other directly One researches while another debugs while a third builds All at once. Zero human orchestration The killer feature ? "Competing Hypotheses Debugging" App crashes. You don't know why Spawn 5 agents. Each investigates a different theory. They try to disprove each other → The one that survives is your answer ! 📌 How to enable it : CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 One line in settings.json Done 📌 What you need to know : → Each agent bills separately (start with 2-3, scale smart) → Assign different files to different agents (avoid conflicts) → Stay in the loop (autonomous ≠ unsupervised) Best for : • Complex debugging when root cause is unclear • Parallel solution exploration • Multi-angle refactoring Skip for : • Single-file edits • Simple implementations Want a full guide for FREE ? Follow Chorouk Malmoum and Comment "AI" 👇

Mécanisme lead magnet

Follow Chorouk Malmoum and Comment "AI" 👇

Livre ton lead magnet automatiquement

Autres lead magnets en claude

Software development

Post LinkedIn

Image

J’ai rarement vu un outil avancer aussi vite : Claude devient difficile à suivre. Opus 4.6 vient de sortir, et pour un dirigeant ça veut dire une chose : moins d’allers-retours, plus de livrables finis. 🚀 Concrètement : 1) Ses “agents” découpent un projet automatiquement (plus besoin de tout cadrer à la main). 2) Ils travaillent en parallèle pour coder plus vite (plusieurs tâches avancent en même temps). 3) Claude crée des présentations directement dans PowerPoint. 4) Il construit des modèles complexes nativement dans Excel. 5) Claude 4.6 a maintenant une fenêtre de 1M de tokens : vous pouvez lui donner 500 pages, il suit sans broncher. Résultat : fini les copier-coller entre outils, et moins de temps perdu à “réexpliquer” le contexte. J’ai résumé les 20 meilleurs nouveaux cas d’usage + exactement comment accéder à ces fonctionnalités : répondez “OPUS” et je vous l’envoie (connexion requise)

répondez “OPUS” et je vous l’envoie

Software development

Post LinkedIn

Image

I built the same app with 4 AI's. Who built it best? Here are the results. The test: Build a client management dashboard for a digital agency. Using the exact same prompt for each. Ranking based on: > UI/Design > Logic & Functionality > Backend/Database > Ease of Use Let's break it down: Tool 1: Bolt ⏱️ Time: 10-15 min (slower) 🎨 Design: 6.5/10 - Basic, but functional ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Everything worked 🗄️ Backend: 8/10 - Seamless Supabase integration, built-in security scanner 🧭 Ease of use: 7.5/10 Solid all-around. Nothing flashy, nothing broken. Tool 2: Base44 ⏱️ Time: Few minutes 🎨 Design: 6.5/10 - Very "vibe coded" looking ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Did the job 🗄️ Backend: 8/10 - Auto-built Google auth which was nice 🧭 Ease of use: 6.5/10 - UI feels clunky The underdog. Works, but feels like it's playing catch-up on polish. Tool 3: Replit ⏱️ Time: 20-30 min 🎨 Design: 7.5/10 - Actually tried to match the reference ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Standard 🗄️ Backend: 6/10 - Confusing, hard to navigate 🧭 Ease of use: 3/10 One prompt and I hit usage limits. Couldn't even continue building. Brutal experience. Tool 4: Lovable ⏱️ Time: ~5 min (fastest) 🎨 Design: 7/10 - Cleanest, most polished ⚙️ Logic: 7.5/10 - Smart intuition (reminded me to create clients before projects) 🗄️Backend: 8/10 - Seamless with options 🧭 Ease of use: 9/10 Just works. Everything feels intuitive. Final rankings: 🥇 Lovable - Best overall experience 🥈 Bolt - Reliable second 🥉 Base44 - Needs polish 4️⃣ Replit - Stuck in no-man's land The truth? They're all using the same AI models. The difference is UX. Key takeaway: These tools live or die by ease of use. Replit is caught between "dev tool" and "no-code" - serving neither well. For non-technical builders: Lovable or Bolt. For technical folks: Just use Cursor. Full video breakdown on my channel. Comment "Ranking" for the link, or search on YT.

Comment "Ranking" for the link

Software development

Post LinkedIn

Image

My 124 AI agents are now running my whole company. Engineering. Product. Design. Sales. Marketing. Finance. Legal. Security. HR. IT. 15 departments. All shipping. All talking to each other. Zero meetings. They deploy services, review PRs, debate architecture decisions, close deals, and wish each other happy birthday. Here's the thing... none of it is real. No LLM calls. No API keys. No cloud bill. It's a screensaver. But watching it run is weirdly satisfying. Because it's the version of work we all wish existed: → Everyone knows what they're doing → Nobody schedules a "quick sync" to discuss the sync → Things just... ship I vibe-coded the whole thing in one session with Claude Code. 878 lines of Python. Open source. Drop a "🤖" in the comments and I'll send you the link. Or just check the first comment.

Drop a "🤖" in the comments and I'll send you the link.

Demander le retrait de ce post