Openai
Post LinkedIn lead magnet · Openai
Last month, I tested 5 AIs for account research. This month, I added GPT-5 Thinking and Opus 4.1 to the test. Here's what happened. My problem: Customer needs account intel on companies with minimal public data. Which AI actually delivers? My experiment: - 1 target account: Windsurf (AI-native IDE, ~80 sales reps) - 1 use case: If I were a rep for Clay - Same prompt → 6 models 6 AI models: 🤖 ChatGPT Plus (GPT-5 Thinking) 🤖 ChatGPT Plus (o3 model) 🤖 Grok 4 🤖 Claude Pro (Opus 4.1) 🤖 Perplexity Pro 🤖 Gemini 2.5 Pro Each model got the exact same detailed prompt: Research Windsurf, find specific pain points indicating they'd benefit from Clay. My Ranking Methodology: ✅ Reasoning - Can it connect dots between data points? ✅ Web Access - How deep does it dig for insights? ✅ Additional Context - Does it surface relevant info I didn't ask for? ❌ Hallucination - Makes stuff up? The verdict: 🥇 GPT-5 Thinking: 9/10 - New champion 🥈 ChatGPT o3: 7/10 - Speed king 🥉 Claude 4.1: 5/10 - No improvement 🥉 Perplexity: 5/10 - Limited ⚠️ Grok 4: 2/10 - Don't bother ❌ Gemini 2.5 Pro: 0/10 - 3 hallucinations 3 surprises from yesterday's tests: - Gemini = hallucination machine (3 fake facts in 2 tests, proceed with caution) - GPT-5 Thinking finally stable (was inconsistent at launch, now consistently crushing it) - o3 feels nerfed (less powerful than my last test - did OpenAI throttle it?) -- What's your go-to for account research? -- Drop a "👨🍳" for the full breakdown + video (paid subs get my battle-tested prompt).
Mécanisme lead magnet
Drop a "👨🍳" for the full breakdown + video