Exemples de lead magnets LinkedIn en professional services

I spent 17 minutes building an AI system that does what Justin Welsh's $10M funnel does. And it outperformed his entire setup in 48 hours. Here's what LinkedIn gurus won't tell you about "proven funnels": They're teaching you to build horse carriages while everyone else is driving Teslas. Justin's funnel is brilliant. For 2019. His newsletter strategy? Perfect. Before AI existed. His $2,880/hour coaching? Makes sense when automation was simple Zapier workflows. But , we're living in 2025. I took his exact funnel structure and rebuilt it with AI: → His 3-product pyramid? AI agent handles all tiers simultaneously → 200k email list? My AI qualifies 1,700 leads without sending a single spam email → 48% open rates? Try 73% when AI personalizes every touchpoint → $17,100 MRR from upsells? One client hit $32k in ONE WEEK Here's what actually matters: 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻'𝘀 𝗪𝗮𝘆: • Write 5 posts daily • Cross-post everywhere • Build email list for years • Hope for 150k impressions 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗪𝗮𝘆 (𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱): • AI tests 50 hook variations in seconds • Auto-publishes to 7 platforms • Qualifies leads BEFORE they hit your DMs • 987 comments on ONE post I'm not dissing Justin. The man's a legend. But copying his 2019 playbook in 2025 is like bringing a knife to a drone fight. My "too simple" 3-tool stack just processed 1,700 founders at Istanbul Slush'D. While you're studying his funnel... I'm building systems that replace entire agencies in 17 minutes. Want the ACTUAL playbook that works today? Drop a comment below this post and I'll send you: 1. My 3-tool AI stack blueprint 2. The exact prompts that generated $127k last quarter 3. Why complex funnels are dead (7-min video proof) P.S. Still following 2019 strategies? That's like using a flip phone because Nokia was successful. P.P.S. Repost if you want priority access!

I tested ChatGPT vs Gemini 3 vs Claude for 30 days of LinkedIn content. The winner shocked me... Most founders waste 3-5 hours daily on content creation. - ChatGPT writes generic corporate fluff - Claude sounds too academic - Gemini 3? Different story entirely. I ran 30 client posts through each AI tool. Same prompts. Same topics. Same CTAs. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝟯𝟬 𝗱𝗮𝘆𝘀: ChatGPT posts: → 2.3% average engagement rate → 12 qualified leads generated → Zero viral posts Claude posts: → 3.1% average engagement rate → 18 qualified leads generated → 1 post hit 5k views Gemini 3 posts: → 8.7% average engagement rate → 127 qualified leads generated → 4 posts went viral (200k+ views) Why Gemini 3 crushed the competition: • Writes like a human, not a robot • Creates actual hooks that stop scrolling • Understands LinkedIn's algorithm nuances • Generates CTAs people actually follow The biggest difference? ChatGPT and Claude write what they think LinkedIn wants. Gemini 3 writes what your audience actually reads. I've now switched my entire content system to Gemini 3. Same time investment. 4x the pipeline. Want my exact Gemini 3 prompt framework that generated 127 leads? 1. Connect with me 2. Comment "TEST" below I'll send you the complete testing methodology + winning prompts. P.S. - The prompts alone won't make you successful. But they'll save you 30 hours of testing I already did for you.

I analyzed the top 3 creators making $1M/year and realized they're all doing the same thing wrong. Justin Welsh. Lara Acosta. Matt Lakajev. Combined revenue: $12M+ Combined mistake: They're still building funnels like it's 2019. Here's what nobody wants to admit: 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 "𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗻" 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹𝘀: • 200k email lists taking years to build • 38-post campaigns for a single launch • 1,058 calls to close 364 deals • Complex upsell sequences generating $17k MRR 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝟭𝟳 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝘂𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺: • AI qualifies leads before they enter the funnel • Zero manual posts - AI tests and publishes what works • 73% email open rates (not 48%) • One client: $32k in ONE WEEK I'm not saying they're failing. They're for sure crushing it. But they're crushing it the hard way. Justin's 3-product pyramid? My AI creates unlimited offers simultaneously. Lara's 38-post campaign? My AI generates 53 variations and picked the winner. Matt's 1,058 calls? My system pre-qualifies so you only talk to buyers. They're teaching you their old playbooks for $497. Meanwhile, I just processed 1,700 founders at an event with 3 tools. 𝗢𝗹𝗱 𝗙𝘂𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝗟𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰: → More steps = more control → More content = more trust → More calls = more sales 𝗔𝗜 𝗙𝘂𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆: → Fewer steps = higher conversion → Smarter content = instant trust → Better qualification = only quality calls Everyone's copying what worked but nobody's building what works NOW. Want the blueprint that's actually working in 2025? Comment below this post and I'll send you: • My 3-creator funnel teardown (what to steal, what to skip) • The exact AI system replacing their complex setups • Why million-dollar funnels are dead simple now P.S. Still building 47-step funnels is like still using a fax machine because it worked in 1995. P.P.S. Repost if you want priority access!

My brother and I tested 17 AI lead magnets. Only 3 actually booked calls. 3 total. Out of 17. Everyone's asking the same question: "Which AI should I use?" Here's what 82% failure rate taught me about AI lead generation: 1. Most AI lead magnet problems aren't AI problems. We thought our AI-generated guides weren't converting. Wrong. The real issue was that we were solving problems nobody actually had. One "Ultimate AI Toolkit" got 1,747 leads. Zero calls booked. People don't want more tools but they want specific, actionable solutions. 2. Your best performers benefit most from AI magnets. Sounds backward, but it's true. Our highest-converting lead magnet (16% booking rate) was our most advanced: "Replace Your $10k/month Agency in 17 Minutes." Beginners downloaded our "AI Basics Guide" but never booked. Pros who already understood AI crushed it with our advanced systems. 3. How you prepare your magnet matters more than which AI you use. We tested GPT-4, Claude, Gemini. Conversion difference? 0.3%. But when we changed our 47-page guide into a 7-minute video walkthrough? Bookings jumped 4x. 4. The biggest improvements came from talking to users. Not from copmetitor research. Not from AI suggestions. From DMs asking "How did you get 987 comments on one post?" That became our top converter. just listen to what people are literally asking you. 5. Simple should be your last resort. Just kidding. Simple should be your FIRST resort. Our "AI Funnel Mastery Course" (6 modules, 3 hours): 1 booking. Our "3-Tool Stack Blueprint" (one page): 127 bookings. We spent weeks perfecting the course. The blueprint took 20 minutes. 6. You don't need to be perfect to win. Magnet #7 had typos. Magnet #12 had a broken link for 3 days. Both outperformed our "perfect" lead magnets. because they solved real problems fast. Deliver value and people forgive imperfection. 7. AI productivity is nearly impossible to measure. Downloads? Easy to track. But which magnet led to our $32k client? No idea. They downloaded 4 different guides before booking. Attribution is nearly impossible 8. Many people are stuck in "idea paralysis" despite powerful tools. They have AI, tools and time but don't know what to build. My solution was that I tracked every question in my DMs for 7 days. Turned the top 3 into lead magnets. The 3 that actually worked: • "3-Tool AI Stack Blueprint" - 14 bookings • "Replace Your Agency in 17 Minutes" - 23 bookings • "987 Comments Breakdown" - 18 bookings The spectacular failures: Everything else. Including the one that took 3 weeks to build. Want to see the exact data from all 17 tests? Want my best-converting lead magnet framework? Comment "STEAL" and I'll send you my "Steal My Full 2025 Lead Magnet Funnel" which is the exact system we use to turn LinkedIn content into booked calls. (It's the one that actually converts, not the 50-page guide collecting dust) P.S. My brother still thinks magnet #9 should have worked. It didn't.

1 an pour récupérer 24 000€. Voici comment j'ai géré mon premier gros impayé 👇 📅 Avril 2025 : je livre un recrutement. 📅 Mai 2025 : j'envoie la facture. 📅 Juillet 2025 : toujours rien. Étape 1 : Comprendre J'active des contacts et j'apprends 2 choses. → la boîte a des problèmes de tréso → je ne suis pas le seul à attendre Étape 2 : Tendre la main 4 relances par mail. Plusieurs messages vocaux. Je propose même un échéancier. Zéro réponse. Ghosting total. Étape 3 : Sortir les gants de boxe Octobre 2025 : je mandate un cabinet de recouvrement. La procédure judiciaire est lancée. ⚖️ Janvier 2026 : 1ère saisie. 0€ sur le compte. Échec. ⚖️ Février 2026 : 2e saisie. La somme est gelée. ⚖️ Avril 2026 : délai de contestation passé. Je touche l'argent. Les leçons que j'en tire : ✅ Aller vite ==> j'ai été patient 5 mois, c'est trop. La procédure prend déjà du temps, n'en perds pas avant. ✅ Garder des traces ==> Chaque relance, chaque tentative amiable = une preuve de bonne foi devant le juge. ✅ Persévérer ==> 1ère saisie ratée ≠ fin de partie. On recommence. ✅ Bien s'entourer ==> le droit, c'est un métier. Mieux vaut déléguer à des pros. Sans le cabinet, je n'aurais jamais vu cet argent. Et toi, tu as déjà encaissé un impayé ? Le nom du cabinet qui m'a sauvé ? En commentaire. 👇

The clock is ticking on the billable hour. If AI makes you 40% faster, you earn 40% less. Increased efficiency without the evolution of your pricing will undermine the foundations of your business. --- You've probably felt this already. A first draft that took a day gets done in an hour. Research that consumed a week, by Tuesday. The work is better and it's quicker. Simon-Kucher, the global pricing consultancy, pulls no punches. They're calling it the "AI-Pocalypse" for professional services pricing. This isn't a future problem. Your clients can see it. Your competitors are adapting to it. --- 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗱. Your clients paid for the hour. They cared about the outcome. AI has collapsed the notion that more time equals more value. The time is less. The value is the same, in many cases higher. That's not a crisis. It's an advantage. If you change the model. --- 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗲, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲. Start by identifying where AI is already saving your team time. That's your signal. Then: 1. Pick the repeatable outcome (the thing clients keep buying) 2. Standardise the inputs (what you will and won't include) 3. Tier the offer (good / better / best) 4. Price on risk removed or revenue created --- What this looks like in practice: Take management reporting. A consultancy used to bill 20 hours a month on operational data. AI now handles the compilation and first-pass analysis in a fraction of the time. Old model: 20 hours x hourly rate = revenue that shrinks as you improve. New model: ✅ Core: Monthly operational dashboard + your interpretation of what it means, fixed fee ✅ Plus: Add a quarterly strategic review with recommendations you own ✅ Premium: Add ad-hoc analysis on demand + direct access to your senior team The tiers escalate on judgment, impact, and value. Each level adds more of what AI cannot do: your read on the numbers, your experience, your client relationships. The scope is clear. The value is priced. The faster you deliver, the more profitable it gets. --- Command your premium. Amplify judgment, expertise, and relationships. The time AI gives back is an opportunity. Reinvest it into the work that earns the premium: your judgment, your client relationships, your expertise. Those are the things a tool will never replace. --- Every service business will face this question. Not whether to move, but when. Businesses that get on the front foot have the opportunity to set the terms of engagement. To deploy AI while others are still thinking about it. And on terms that make sense to them. --- What's the one service you could productise this month? If you'd like my 1-page productisation checklist, comment PRODUCTISE and I'll send it over. ♻️ Repost if you found this insightful. Follow Tom Jones for more on AI and workflow redesign.

Buying an accounting firm? If you only look at customers, you are missing the real risk. Private equity does not just look at customers, they also look at employees. When I evaluate an accounting firm acquisition for private equity, I analyze the team. I look at: Salary Billable hours Utilization rate Bill rate Revenue per employee This tells you who is actually driving margin, who is mispriced relative to market, and who is not pulling their weight. PE firms do this obsessively because labor efficiency is where returns are won or lost. Overpaid teams, low utilization, or weak revenue per head will show up immediately in EBITDA and post-close performance. This also is one of the easiest ways PE firms can increase profit margins and therefore Enterprise Value. I also roll this up by level so I can quickly see revenue per level, salary per level, and utilization rate. It gives a great picture of who you are buying and who you want to retain after close. If you want the worksheet I use to analyze payroll and productivity when buying a firm, comment “payroll” and I will send it to you. #PrivateEquity #AccountingFirms #MergersAndAcquisitions #DueDiligence #ProfessionalServices #SearchFund

15 years in telecom operations taught me one thing: The tools aren't the problem. The handoffs are. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜 𝘀𝗮𝘄 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝟭𝟱 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀: - Provisioning delayed because systems didn't sync - Customer complaints because status updates were manual - Escalations because no one owned the middle steps - Good people producing bad outcomes because of bad systems Same problems. Every company. Different industry labels. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗜 𝗹𝗲𝗳𝘁. And started fixing those problems for other companies. Last quarter alone: - E-commerce company: Order confirmations now send in 30 seconds (was 6 hours) - Professional services: Invoice processing 16 hours → 2 hours per month - B2B SaaS: Lead response time 14 hours → 8 minutes 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀: I don't approach automation as a technologist. I approach it as someone who lived inside broken operations for 15 years. I know where information gets lost (handoffs). I know why good people fail (bad systems). I know what makes processes stick (ownership). The tools are new. The problems are familiar. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸: Two companies weren't ready to start. One was perfect (clear problem, measurable pain, ready to change). We start Monday. 𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆: You can describe your biggest operational bottleneck in one sentence. You know what it costs in time/money. You're willing to change how things work. I've got 2 slots open this month. 90-minute process audit. We'll map what's broken and build a roadmap to fix it. Comment "AUDIT" or send me a DM. First come, first served.

On s'est rencontrés dans un événement de réseautage. Quelques mois plus tard, Jonathan me confiait son business. Voici ce qui a changé. Jonathan dirige Green Bug. Solutions écologiques pour le résidentiel et le commercial. Une boîte qui grandit. Une ambition claire : conquérir le B2B d'ici 2026. Mais il y avait un mur. → Base de données clients éparpillée sur plusieurs outils → Aucun système de suivi structuré → Des relances qui tombaient dans l'oubli → Aucune visibilité sur le pipeline de ventes Jonathan voulait scaler vers le B2B. Mais son backend le ralentissait. Ce qu'on a mis en place : ✓ Import et centralisation de toute sa base clients ✓ CRM configuré sur mesure ✓ Automatisations : accueil, formulaires, rappels ✓ Système téléphonique + gestion des permissions ✓ Campagne email de référencement bi-annuelle Le résultat ? Une infrastructure solide pour sa croissance B2B. Une équipe qui gagne du temps. Un Jonathan qui peut enfin se concentrer sur le développement des partenariats. Mais ce qui compte le plus, c'est son retour : "De la prise en charge, l'évaluation des besoins jusqu'à la livraison du mandat... une équipe rapide, compétente et professionnelle. Nous avons vraiment eu le sentiment d'être accompagnés par des PRO." Ce qui me rend fier, c'est pas le 5 étoiles. C'est le mot "accompagnés". Parce qu'un outil sans accompagnement, c'est juste un outil de plus qui prend la poussière. Merci Jonathan pour la confiance. 🙏 --- Si tu sens que ton système actuel freine ta croissance, envoie-moi "CROISSANCE" en message privé. Je te montre comment on construit une infrastructure qui grandit avec toi.

STOP struggling with Cold outreach I'm booking 2-3 calls every day without SDRs or setters... I analyzed struggling B2B founders. From agencies to SaaS to professional services: - Burning 25+ hours per week on manual outreach - Hiring 200K+ yearly SDRs with high turnover - Running ads that drain cash with zero guarantee - Grinding cold calls that kill energy and margins - Missing leads because response times are too slow - Using generic templates that get numbers banned - Paying agencies that don't understand their business And many more problems I kept seeing on repeat. I figured out why they were stuck. And built an SMS infrastructure that removes the need to hire. So you can scale without adding headcount. I am giving away the full breakdown of this SMS system for free. The exact system that books 2-3 qualified calls per day on autopilot. Want it? 1. Connect with me 2. Comment "SMS" I will send you the complete implementation guide. PS - Repost this for priority access

Harvard Business Review study: companies that respond within 1 hour are 7x more likely to qualify a lead. Not the best offer. Not the cheapest price. The first response wins. The average B2B response time? 42 hours. In those 42 hours: → Your prospect visits 3 competitor sites → 2 competitors respond within 2 hours → 1 books a discovery call for tomorrow → You call back to a dead lead You never had a chance. This is reality for consulting firms, agencies, and professional services. Here's how we fix this for our clients: AI agents that respond in under 60 seconds ↓ Qualify leads automatically. ↓ Book meetings straight into calendars. Still responding manually? You're competing with one hand tied behind your back. P.S. DM me "AUDIT" and let’s chat to see if a speed-to-lead system fits your business.

Faran Memon had an idle LinkedIn profile for 7 months. 14 days later: $10K in closed deals. We did it with the same audience and without ads. Most founders obsess over growing followers. Faran focused on conversions instead. His follower count? Stayed exactly the same. His revenue? Exploded. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲 $𝟭𝟬𝗞: 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲: "Book a growth conversation" 𝗔𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿: "Want an extra $10K/month?" → Result-based CTAs convert 4x better 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲: Generic banner with his face 𝗔𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿: Contrasting colors pointing to featured section → Visual hierarchy that actually directs traffic 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲: Direct calendar link 𝗔𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿: Landing page → VSL → Two-step opt-in → Friction removal = 3x more booked calls 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲: 5 different links in featured section 𝗔𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿: Only 2 clear paths (free training + book a call) → Simplicity beats options every single time 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆 𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗸𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁: While everyone's posting more content, Faran built: • Free community (126 members now consuming daily) • Email nurture sequence from lead magnet • VSL that pre-qualifies before calls Result of a couple weeks ago: 42 sales calls. $34K revenue collected. Same profile optimization framework. Just kept running. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗽𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝗲 𝗼𝗳𝗳: Creators spending $5K/month on ghostwriters... When their profile converts like garbage. You're driving traffic to a broken funnel. Fix your profile first. Then worry about content. Want Farhan's exact profile transformation? Comment "PROFILE" below and I'll send you: → 15-minute breakdown video of every change we made → My transformation report with 10+ client profile makeovers → The exact VSL funnel Faran uses (converts at 23%) → Faran's landing page templates that book 5-7 calls weekly → The exact psychology behind Faran's profile I'll send you the complete breakdown - banner templates, VSL scripts, landing page structure. P.S. - Faran's Dutch. This works in any language, any niche. Stop making excuses. Here's a list of our results on one page: https://lnkd.in/eiMw8s4T ♻️ Repost and I'll DM you my "Profile Audit Checklist" - the same 27-point system I use to spot $10K+ in missed revenue on any LinkedIn profile

A therapist I worked with got zero clients from his website for 3 years. Today, his site brings him bookings and sells his book on autopilot. Here’s what I did NOT do: ➤ rebuild his website. ➤ change the design. ➤ chase trends. I fixed the pages he already had so they were understandable to Google and to someone who wasn’t him. Then I added one new page for his book. No fancy design, I focused on a clear, findable and functional minimalist page that's written for people who were already looking for help. That’s it. The most interesting part came later: ➤ Within 2 months he got his first booking from his website. ➤ A lady who had seen him in an interview 5 years earliers booked a session after finding his site. She couldn’t remember his full name, only his first name and his profession. That was enough for her to find him. Because his website did its job when her need finally became urgent. This is why I’m so all in on websites: they don’t require chasing people, they wait. And when the moment is right, they show up. If your site has been “fine” for years but hasn’t brought you a single booking or maybe you've had bookings but you know you could have way more, that's fixable. DM me for a free diagnosis and walk away with the exact steps you need to take (or I can do it for you if you don't have time for it).

HIRING: Building an AI powerhouse team. 3 part-time roles. $2.5-4K/month. We're scaling our AI content system differently. We want creators who understand this: AI handles the heavy lifting. Humans handle the magic. Our AI systems already generate 987 leads per post. Our funnels qualify leads before anyone types a word. Our automation tests 50 variations while you sleep. What we need: Sharp minds who can turn AI output into human connection. 𝗥𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝟭: 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁-𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗽𝘆𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿/𝗖𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗪𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿 (𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 + 𝗘𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹) Pay: $2.5-3.5K/month (20 hrs/week) Location: Remote (UK, EU, US, AUS, CAN only) You'll thrive if you: • Have 2+ years writing content that actually converts (not just "looks nice") • Understand LinkedIn's algorithm better than LinkedIn does • Can write emails that get 73% open rates (we'll show you how) • Know the difference between AI-assisted and AI-dependent 𝗥𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝟮: 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁-𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗿 (𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗙𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀) Pay: $2.5-3K/month (20 hrs/week) Location: Remote (timezone flexible) You'll crush it if you: • Have managed LinkedIn accounts that grew by 5K+ followers • Know when to post, what to test, and how to read the data • Can spot a winning hook from 100 yards away • Actually enjoy engaging with comments (not just hearting them) 𝗥𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝟯: 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁-𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗦𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 (𝗣𝗵𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲) Pay: $3-4K/month (Base + Commission, 20 hrs/week) Location: Remote (must handle US/EU calls) Perfect fit if you: • Have 2+ years closing deals on the phone (not just "booking calls") • Can turn a cold lead warm in 3 minutes • Understand consultative selling beats pushy tactics every time • Want to sell something that actually works We're scaling multiple LinkedIn personal brands. Fast. Right now, these roles support our main profile. But as we grow? These part-time positions could become full-time opportunities. Want to build the future of AI-powered marketing with us? Comment "HUMAN" and I'll send you: • The simple application process (hint: it's one Loom video) • What a typical day actually looks like • Why our team members never want to leave P.S. If you're looking for a "chill remote job," this isn't it. We're building something special here. P.P.S. Know someone perfect? Tagging them would be great.

Tu prêterais ta Ferrari à un ado qui vient d'avoir son permis ? Difficile de lui faire ses adieux parce que 👉 Un bien de grande valeur entre les mains de quelqu'un sans compétence n'a JAMAIS donné de bons résultats. Malheureusement tu nages dans le piège du "je prends le moins cher" : • Tu "économises" un peu aujourd'hui pour perdre 20 000€ de CA demain • Tu payera deux fois pour tout refaire correctement • Tu as un site amateur qui te décrédibilise Alors que derrière chaque site qui convertit, il y a une équipe d’experts Pas un stagiaire qui "connaît un peu Wordpress" Pour ta croissance durable, il faut plus qu’un simple travail d’amateur. On en parle ? Écris "stagiaire" et je bondis dans tes DM 🐇

My client went from 0 → €30k in 14 days. (here's the exact LinkedIn post that started it all) Faran was posting daily. Getting likes. Zero leads. Sound familiar? We changed ONE thing and his calendar exploded. 43 calls booked. €30k closed. 14 days. The post wasn't special. It didn't have fancy graphics. But it had this 4-word CTA that most creators mess up: "Comment 'YES' for access" That's it. Dead simple. But here's what happened behind the scenes: → Profile optimized to convert visitors → Lead magnet that actually solved a problem → Automation that delivered instantly The post itself? Standard tactical content. Nothing groundbreaking. But the system behind it? Pure conversion machine. Results in 24 hours: • 987 comments • 785 qualified leads captured • 34 sales calls booked • 0 cold DMs sent While everyone's obsessing over viral hooks, Faran built a machine that prints money. The craziest part? Nico has 1.6k followers. Uses the same system. Books 5 calls every week. It's not about followers. It's not about going viral. It's about the system. Want to see the exact post breakdown + the automation behind it? Drop a "FARAN" below and I'll send you the case study. P.S. This works whether you have 500 or 50k followers. The system doesn't care about your vanity metrics. P.P.S. Here's a pic of me having dinner with Faran & his family. He can make a killer curry rice & chicken!

From hacking my high school grades to hacking LinkedIn's algorithm (the pattern I can't unsee) At 17, I hacked my grades. At 24, I'm hacking LinkedIn. Same energy, legal results. The pattern? Systems always have exploits. You just need to find them. Back then: Changed F's to C's in the school database. Now: Turn 100 views into 987 comments. Both times I noticed the same thing: Everyone follows the rules blindly. 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗼𝗶𝘁: Teachers trusted the system. One SQL injection later, I passed. (Don't try this. Seriously.) 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗼𝗶𝘁 #1: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗰𝗸 Everyone writes "Great post!" I write "Comment YES for the guide" 987 comments. 43 calls booked. 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗼𝗶𝘁 #2: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗰𝗸 Everyone lists achievements. I write "I help you [specific result]" Profile views → DMs → Calls. 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗼𝗶𝘁 #3: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗮𝗰𝗸 Everyone posts at 8am. I post when my audience scrolls. Same content. 3x engagement. The pattern is always there: 1. Find where everyone follows the crowd 2. Test the opposite 3. Scale what works My clients used these "exploits." • $30k in 14 days. • 1.6k followers. €8k closed. • 43 calls from 1 post • 7 calls after working together for 7 days Systems want you to play by their rules. But the real wins come from finding the gaps. What "rules" are you still following? P.S. My high school eventually caught me. LinkedIn hasn't. Yet. 😅

Claude ne se contente plus de répondre. Il travaille directement sur votre PC. Cowork, c'est l'agent IA d'Anthropic qui tourne sur votre bureau. Pas dans un onglet de navigateur. Sur votre machine, avec vos fichiers. Concrètement, il lit vos documents locaux, enchaîne les tâches en autonomie et vous livre un résultat finalisé. Une présentation trimestrielle qui prenait 3 heures ? 15 minutes. Un contrat à relire et annoter ? Il le fait pendant que vous êtes en rendez-vous. Un tableau Excel à restructurer ? Il s'en charge sans que vous ouvriez le fichier. C'est pas un chatbot à qui vous posez des questions. C'est un assistant qui exécute. Le problème, c'est que 90% des gens l'installent et ne savent pas par où commencer. Mauvais réglages, mauvais prompts, résultats décevants. J'ai compilé un guide avec l'installation pas à pas, les cas d'usage concrets pour entrepreneurs et professions libérales, et les bonnes pratiques pour en tirer le maximum dès le premier jour. Commentez COWORK pour le recevoir.

Google Business Profile, c’est juste pour les restos du coin ?c’est faux. Que vous soyez consultant SEO, agent immobilier ou avocat. Vous avez tout intérêt à vous démarquer. Et, vous avez aussi besoin d’une fiche Google Business Profile. 📲Pourquoi ? Parce que Google affiche des profils Business même sur des recherches sans localisation. Faites le test : ➡️Tapez « consultant SEO »➡️ Des fiches Google Business Profile en première page. Ne confondez pas Google Business Profile avec un simple annuaire de quartier. C’est une fiche gratuite qui peut rapporter beaucoup en visibilité. Et pourtant,60 % des professionnels de services pensent encore que Google Business Profile ne les concerne pas. Alors, si vous travaillez dans une zone géographique précise,faites-le savoir à Google. 👉 Une fiche bien optimisée peut clairement faire la différence. ________________ 📸 𝗘𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘀-𝗺𝗼𝗶 ! 𝗝𝗲 𝘁’𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗿𝗲 𝘂𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗲́-𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗲 𝘁𝗮 𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝗼𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁’𝗮𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗮̀ 𝘆 𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗿 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗿 𝗲𝘁 𝗮̀ 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗹𝘂𝘀 𝗱𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘅. 🫧 + 𝗱𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗲𝘁 𝗽𝗹𝘂𝘀 𝗱𝗲 𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲 𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗰 𝗹𝗲 𝗦𝗘𝗢 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗮𝗹

Vous hésitez à créer un site ? 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝗲𝘇-𝘃𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝟯 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀. Avant toute décision 1. Refusez-vous des clients parce que vous en avez trop ? 2. Quand on vous recommande, la personne recommandé tombe-t-elle sur 𝘂𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗶 𝗹𝘂𝗶 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝘃𝗶𝗲 𝗱𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝘇-𝘃𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗰 𝘃𝗼𝘂𝘀 ❓ 3. Quand un prospect vous compare à un concurrent, êtes-vous sûr que votre image en ligne vous fait gagner le choix ? Si vous avez répondu “non” à une seule question, ce n’est pas un problème de talent. C’est 𝙪𝙣 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙗𝙡𝙚̀𝙢𝙚 𝙙’𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙛𝙖𝙘𝙚 Pour résoudre ce problème d’interface. 𝙅’𝙖𝙞 𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙖𝙜𝙣𝙚́ 𝙥𝙡𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙚𝙪𝙧𝙨 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙛𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙡𝙨 𝙧𝙚́𝙜𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚́𝙨 à transformer leur site en outil de tri, de réassurance et de prise de rendez-vous. Si vous voulez voir à quoi ressemble une bonne interface, envoyez-moi “𝗦𝗶𝘁𝗲” en message privé. Je vous partagerai 𝟱 𝗱𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝗲𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘂𝗿𝘀 𝗿𝗲́𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀.