Lead magnet LinkedIn — Software development

Software development

Post LinkedIn lead magnet · Claude

How to run Claude Code like the engineer who built it. (Boris Cherny, the head of Claude Code, just revealed his exact workflow) Follow these 6 steps. ↓ Most engineers use Claude Code like a chatbot. They prompt one session and wait. You can run 10 to 15 sessions in parallel and ship code simultaneously instead. 1/ Set Up Parallel Sessions -Terminal: Run 5 Claude Code sessions simultaneously in your terminal -Web: Run 5 to 10 additional sessions in the browser at the same time -Combined: Every session works on a different task while you focus elsewhere 2/ Build Your CLAUDE.md File -Self-improvement loop: After every correction, Claude updates its own rules so the mistake never happens again -Lessons file: All rules live in tasks/lessons.md and are reviewed at the start of every session -The command: "After every correction, end with: Update your CLAUDE.md so you don't make that mistake again" 3/ Set Workflow Orchestration Rules -Plan Node Default: Enter plan mode for any task with 3 or more steps before writing a single line -Subagent Strategy: Offload research, exploration, and parallel analysis to subagents to keep main context clean -Verification Before Done: Never mark a task complete without proving it works first 4/ Structure Every Task in 3 Parts -Part 1: Write plan to tasks/todo.md with checkable items before starting -Part 2: Execute with high-level summary at each step, mark items complete as you go -Part 3: Add review section to tasks/todo.md and update tasks/lessons.md after corrections 5/ Set Core Principles -Simplicity First: Make every change as simple as possible, minimal code impact -No Laziness: Find root causes, no temporary fixes, senior developer standards -Minimal Impact: Changes should only touch what is necessary, never introduce bugs 6/ Delegate Entire Problem Types -SQL: Boris has not written a single line of SQL in 6 months, Claude pulls BigQuery data directly via CLI -Bug fixing: When given a bug report, Claude fixes it autonomously, zero context switching required -CI tests: Claude fixes failing tests without being told how This is just one way to use Claude Code the way its builder actually uses it. Want the full Claude Code system? → Comment "CODE" and I will send it to you

Mécanisme lead magnet

→ Comment "CODE" and I will send it to you

Livre ton lead magnet automatiquement

Autres lead magnets en claude

Software development

Post LinkedIn

Image

I built the same app with 4 AI's. Who built it best? Here are the results. The test: Build a client management dashboard for a digital agency. Using the exact same prompt for each. Ranking based on: > UI/Design > Logic & Functionality > Backend/Database > Ease of Use Let's break it down: Tool 1: Bolt ⏱️ Time: 10-15 min (slower) 🎨 Design: 6.5/10 - Basic, but functional ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Everything worked 🗄️ Backend: 8/10 - Seamless Supabase integration, built-in security scanner 🧭 Ease of use: 7.5/10 Solid all-around. Nothing flashy, nothing broken. Tool 2: Base44 ⏱️ Time: Few minutes 🎨 Design: 6.5/10 - Very "vibe coded" looking ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Did the job 🗄️ Backend: 8/10 - Auto-built Google auth which was nice 🧭 Ease of use: 6.5/10 - UI feels clunky The underdog. Works, but feels like it's playing catch-up on polish. Tool 3: Replit ⏱️ Time: 20-30 min 🎨 Design: 7.5/10 - Actually tried to match the reference ⚙️ Logic: 7/10 - Standard 🗄️ Backend: 6/10 - Confusing, hard to navigate 🧭 Ease of use: 3/10 One prompt and I hit usage limits. Couldn't even continue building. Brutal experience. Tool 4: Lovable ⏱️ Time: ~5 min (fastest) 🎨 Design: 7/10 - Cleanest, most polished ⚙️ Logic: 7.5/10 - Smart intuition (reminded me to create clients before projects) 🗄️Backend: 8/10 - Seamless with options 🧭 Ease of use: 9/10 Just works. Everything feels intuitive. Final rankings: 🥇 Lovable - Best overall experience 🥈 Bolt - Reliable second 🥉 Base44 - Needs polish 4️⃣ Replit - Stuck in no-man's land The truth? They're all using the same AI models. The difference is UX. Key takeaway: These tools live or die by ease of use. Replit is caught between "dev tool" and "no-code" - serving neither well. For non-technical builders: Lovable or Bolt. For technical folks: Just use Cursor. Full video breakdown on my channel. Comment "Ranking" for the link, or search on YT.

Comment "Ranking" for the link

Software development

Post LinkedIn

Image

My 124 AI agents are now running my whole company. Engineering. Product. Design. Sales. Marketing. Finance. Legal. Security. HR. IT. 15 departments. All shipping. All talking to each other. Zero meetings. They deploy services, review PRs, debate architecture decisions, close deals, and wish each other happy birthday. Here's the thing... none of it is real. No LLM calls. No API keys. No cloud bill. It's a screensaver. But watching it run is weirdly satisfying. Because it's the version of work we all wish existed: → Everyone knows what they're doing → Nobody schedules a "quick sync" to discuss the sync → Things just... ship I vibe-coded the whole thing in one session with Claude Code. 878 lines of Python. Open source. Drop a "🤖" in the comments and I'll send you the link. Or just check the first comment.

Drop a "🤖" in the comments and I'll send you the link.

Software development

Post LinkedIn

Image

𝗔𝗻𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗰 𝗘𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗕𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻: 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝘃𝘀. 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝘃𝘀. 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 Different tools for different jobs - one stack. The advantage isn’t “using AI”. It’s knowing which layer to use - and when. Let's break it down. Excellent overview by Rakesh Gohel: ⬇️ 𝟭 - 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗔𝗜 (𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗯𝗼𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘀𝗲𝗿/𝗮𝗽𝗽): ➞ Use it when the work is thinking in words. It’s best at turning vague ideas into structure - drafts, summaries, plans, decisions. It gives you clarity and high-quality writing fast, but you still execute the work elsewhere. Example use cases: ✦ Turn messy notes into a 1-page brief with a recommendation ✦ Rewrite a draft in your voice and tighten it by 30% ✦ Create a decision memo: options, trade-offs, risks, next step 𝟮 - 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲 (𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹): ➞ Use it when the work lives in a repo. It can navigate your codebase, edit across files, run commands, and iterate with feedback like a real pair programmer. It turns intent into working code changes you can test and review. Example use cases: ✦ Create a new application with real functionalities ✦ Debug your existing database module safely ✦ Generate a migration plan, implement it, and validate with checks 𝟯 - 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 (𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗸𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀/𝗮𝗽𝗽𝘀): ➞ Use it when the work is workflows, not thinking. It shines on repetitive operations: organizing folders, extracting data, filling templates, moving things between tools. It turns multi-step busywork into a repeatable automation so you stop doing manual glue work. Example use cases: ✦ Extract tables from PDFs into a clean spreadsheet template ✦ Rename, tag, and sort hundreds of files into a consistent taxonomy ✦ Update a report pack weekly: pull inputs, clean data, export outputs --- 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲: ✦ Thinking and content - Chat ✦ Code and systems - Code ✦ File and app workflows - Cowork 𝗜 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝘆 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗦𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀 𝘆𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗱𝗮𝘆 - 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 “𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝗮𝘂𝗰𝗲” 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱. 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗦𝗞𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗦 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗜’𝗹𝗹 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿.

𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗦𝗞𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗦 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗜’𝗹𝗹 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿.

Demander le retrait de ce post