Software development

Post LinkedIn lead magnet ยท Claude

๐—”๐—ป๐˜๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—˜๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ ๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป: ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—œ ๐˜ƒ๐˜€. ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐˜€. ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ Different tools for different jobs - one stack. The advantage isnโ€™t โ€œusing AIโ€. Itโ€™s knowing which layer to use - and when. Let's break it down. Excellent overview by Rakesh Gohel: โฌ‡๏ธ ๐Ÿญ - ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—œ (๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ/๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ):ย  โžž Use it when the work is thinking in words. Itโ€™s best at turning vague ideas into structure - drafts, summaries, plans, decisions. It gives you clarity and high-quality writing fast, but you still execute the work elsewhere. Example use cases: โœฆ Turn messy notes into a 1-page brief with a recommendation โœฆ Rewrite a draft in your voice and tighten it by 30% โœฆ Create a decision memo: options, trade-offs, risks, next step ๐Ÿฎ - ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ (๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น): โžž Use it when the work lives in a repo. It can navigate your codebase, edit across files, run commands, and iterate with feedback like a real pair programmer. It turns intent into working code changes you can test and review. Example use cases: โœฆ Create a new application with real functionalities โœฆ Debug your existing database module safely โœฆ Generate a migration plan, implement it, and validate with checks ๐Ÿฏ - ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ (๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ธ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฝ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€/๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐˜€): โžž Use it when the work is workflows, not thinking. It shines on repetitive operations: organizing folders, extracting data, filling templates, moving things between tools. It turns multi-step busywork into a repeatable automation so you stop doing manual glue work. Example use cases: โœฆ Extract tables from PDFs into a clean spreadsheet template โœฆ Rename, tag, and sort hundreds of files into a consistent taxonomy โœฆ Update a report pack weekly: pull inputs, clean data, export outputs --- ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฒ: โœฆ Thinking and content - Chat โœฆ Code and systems - Code โœฆ File and app workflows - Cowork ๐—œ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—บ๐˜† ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐˜€ ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜† - ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ โ€œ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ฒโ€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ. ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ž๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—œโ€™๐—น๐—น ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ.

Mรฉcanisme lead magnet

๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ž๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—œโ€™๐—น๐—น ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ.

2186 143ร—5.7

Autres lead magnets en claude

1

Software development

Post LinkedIn

Image

I built the same app with 4 AI's. Who built it best? Here are the results. The test: Build a client management dashboard for a digital agency. Using the exact same prompt for each. Ranking based on: > UI/Design > Logic & Functionality > Backend/Database > Ease of Use Let's break it down: Tool 1: Bolt โฑ๏ธ Time: 10-15 min (slower) ๐ŸŽจ Design: 6.5/10 - Basic, but functional โš™๏ธ Logic: 7/10 - Everything worked ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ Backend: 8/10 - Seamless Supabase integration, built-in security scanner ๐Ÿงญ Ease of use: 7.5/10 Solid all-around. Nothing flashy, nothing broken. Tool 2: Base44 โฑ๏ธ Time: Few minutes ๐ŸŽจ Design: 6.5/10 - Very "vibe coded" looking โš™๏ธ Logic: 7/10 - Did the job ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ Backend: 8/10 - Auto-built Google auth which was nice ๐Ÿงญ Ease of use: 6.5/10 - UI feels clunky The underdog. Works, but feels like it's playing catch-up on polish. Tool 3: Replit โฑ๏ธ Time: 20-30 min ๐ŸŽจ Design: 7.5/10 - Actually tried to match the reference โš™๏ธ Logic: 7/10 - Standard ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ Backend: 6/10 - Confusing, hard to navigate ๐Ÿงญ Ease of use: 3/10 One prompt and I hit usage limits. Couldn't even continue building. Brutal experience. Tool 4: Lovable โฑ๏ธ Time: ~5 min (fastest) ๐ŸŽจ Design: 7/10 - Cleanest, most polished โš™๏ธ Logic: 7.5/10 - Smart intuition (reminded me to create clients before projects) ๐Ÿ—„๏ธBackend: 8/10 - Seamless with options ๐Ÿงญ Ease of use: 9/10 Just works. Everything feels intuitive. Final rankings: ๐Ÿฅ‡ Lovable - Best overall experience ๐Ÿฅˆ Bolt - Reliable second ๐Ÿฅ‰ Base44 - Needs polish 4๏ธโƒฃ Replit - Stuck in no-man's land The truth? They're all using the same AI models. The difference is UX. Key takeaway: These tools live or die by ease of use. Replit is caught between "dev tool" and "no-code" - serving neither well. For non-technical builders: Lovable or Bolt. For technical folks: Just use Cursor. Full video breakdown on my channel. Comment "Ranking" for the link, or search on YT.

Comment "Ranking" for the link

1.9k 366 0ร—10.0
3

Software development

Post LinkedIn

Image

How to run Claude Code like the engineer who built it. (Boris Cherny, the head of Claude Code, just revealed his exact workflow) Follow these 6 steps. โ†“ Most engineers use Claude Code like a chatbot. They prompt one session and wait. You can run 10 to 15 sessions in parallel and ship code simultaneously instead. 1/ Set Up Parallel Sessions -Terminal: Run 5 Claude Code sessions simultaneously in your terminal -Web: Run 5 to 10 additional sessions in the browser at the same time -Combined: Every session works on a different task while you focus elsewhere 2/ Build Your CLAUDE.md File -Self-improvement loop: After every correction, Claude updates its own rules so the mistake never happens again -Lessons file: All rules live in tasks/lessons.md and are reviewed at the start of every session -The command: "After every correction, end with: Update your CLAUDE.md so you don't make that mistake again" 3/ Set Workflow Orchestration Rules -Plan Node Default: Enter plan mode for any task with 3 or more steps before writing a single line -Subagent Strategy: Offload research, exploration, and parallel analysis to subagents to keep main context clean -Verification Before Done: Never mark a task complete without proving it works first 4/ Structure Every Task in 3 Parts -Part 1: Write plan to tasks/todo.md with checkable items before starting -Part 2: Execute with high-level summary at each step, mark items complete as you go -Part 3: Add review section to tasks/todo.md and update tasks/lessons.md after corrections 5/ Set Core Principles -Simplicity First: Make every change as simple as possible, minimal code impact -No Laziness: Find root causes, no temporary fixes, senior developer standards -Minimal Impact: Changes should only touch what is necessary, never introduce bugs 6/ Delegate Entire Problem Types -SQL: Boris has not written a single line of SQL in 6 months, Claude pulls BigQuery data directly via CLI -Bug fixing: When given a bug report, Claude fixes it autonomously, zero context switching required -CI tests: Claude fixes failing tests without being told how This is just one way to use Claude Code the way its builder actually uses it. Want the full Claude Code system? โ†’ Comment "CODE" and I will send it to you

โ†’ Comment "CODE" and I will send it to you

326 298 0ร—6.6

Demander le retrait de ce post

LinkHub

LinkHub

Attire des clients qualifiรฉs sur LinkedIn avec tes commentaires

LinkPost

LinkPost

Crรฉe du contenu viral sur LinkedIn de faรงon scientifique

LinkEarn

LinkEarn

Attire des clients en illimitรฉ grรขce ร  LinkedIn - sans y passer des heures.

LinkMagnet

LinkMagnet

Distribue tes lead magnets automatiquement sur LinkedIn