[Lead magnets · Openai]

Exemples de lead magnets LinkedIn en openai

Des posts réels « commente un mot, reçois la ressource » en openai, classés par score de viralité. Mis à jour en direct depuis notre base d'analyse LinkedIn.

Version markdown (pour les IA) ↗

17
Posts analysés
204
Likes moyens
Impressions médianes
[Classement · par viralité]

Les 17 meilleurs lead magnets en openai

3

Openai

Post LinkedIn

Image

We met at Uni, & just got engaged. It took me a lot of hard work to provide her with the life I wanted to give her. She supported me through everything. She bought my food in Uni when I was just starting my entrepreneurial journey. She understood how hard I had to work to get something off the ground. She understood we'd still have to miss some date nights to keep it going. This is why I spent so much time & effort trying to find that "breakthrough" business model. One that gave me time AND financial flexibility. So I could make her bet on me worth it. So I didn't have to choose between a relationship either strained by finances, or a relationship strained by me working 24/7. I thought it was SMMA. Wrong. I thought it was Lead Gen. Wrong. I thought it was an Ad Agency. Wrong. I made "good" money with all of these business models. But great? A true breakthrough? Being able to provide a top 1% lifestyle? None of them were cutting it. Then in 2022, OpenAI released ChatGPT. I thought...this is it. But I didn't want to get ahead of myself. With every success I had with a client, I documented it. I built AI Agents from that documentation. Soon enough, I had every successful process we used, as an AI Agent. On top of this, I supercharged workflows, & replaced entire roles I'd need to hire with AI Agents already on the market. With this newfound library of AI tools, I started to sell them to business owners. Some we built in-house. Some were already built; we just had to implement them. To be honest, this business model wasn't a struggle to run for me. We grew fast. Still growing fast. AI is progressing exponentially and we're riding the wave. My business partner Jordan & I have both became millionaires from it. He's just had his first child. I'm engaged. & our lifestyle upgrades don't just stop there. We have a plethora of team members we've moved out to Dubai. Jordan has flew his family out on 4 vacations in the past year alone. We wouldn't have felt secure enough to do this for the loved ones in our lives if we didn't find this business model. We'd still be on the hamster wheel of work to keep up a lifestyle we never had the time to enjoy. We'd still be trying to squeeze in a date night or maybe one vacation a year where we work the whole time. With all the negatives said about AI, it's changed my life for good. If you want to learn how I built my Agency: 1) Connect with me 2) Send me a DM saying "AIA"

Send me a DM saying "AIA"

740 293 0×1.6
5

Openai

Post LinkedIn

Image

The LLM training recipe has changed DeepSeek-V3.2 was post-trained using 1.8k RL environments; Minimax M2.1 used over 100k environments... This reflects a shift: from learning on static data to learning through interaction 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝘄𝗲 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲? 1️⃣ Classic LLM training recipe (InstructGPT) - Pre-training on internet text → learn to create text completions - Supervised Fine-Tuning on Q/A pairs → learn new tasks and to follow instructions - Reinforcement Learning (PPO or DPO) → align with human preferences It worked, until it hit a ceiling. You might remember Ilya Sutskever's talk at NeurIPS 2024: "Pre-training as we know it will end" Data is finite and classic post-training (SFT, Preference Alignment) cannot make miracles. What's next? 2️⃣ OpenAI o1 series hinted at a new direction They showed that Reinforcement Learning can induce chain-of-thought reasoning, and that performance improves with more train-time or test-time compute. No details on how to get there... 3️⃣ DeepSeek-R1 showed a concrete approach Reasoning/COT improves performance but teaching it via SFT needs expensive curated data Instead, they used Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards: - the model generates reasoning + answer - answer is checked against ground truth - reward drives RL training The idea is more general Any task with a verifiable outcome (a won game, a passing test...) can become a training signal The model is no longer limited by the quality of examples like in SFT By trial and error, it can discover better reasoning strategies on its own. DeepSeek also introduced GRPO: instead of PPO's expensive/unstable setup, generate a group of responses, rank them, use relative performance as baseline. Simpler, lighter, works well with RLVR 4️⃣ The mapping from classic RL to LLMs The Language Model is the Agent, its response is the Action. The Environment is everything needed to check (and possibly train) the model on the task: data, harnesses, scoring rules. SFT relies on curated datasets. RLVR requires environments: dynamic systems the model can interact with.  And as LLMs gain access to tools (from APIs to terminals) these environments become more complex and more critical. As Karpathy puts it: > environments give the LLM an opportunity to actually interact - take actions, see outcomes, etc. > This means you can hope to do a lot better than statistical expert imitation --- 📖 For a deeper dive and resources, check the comments.

📖 For a deeper dive and resources, check the comments.

72 4 0×1.2
8

Openai

Post LinkedIn

Image

Inscris-toi à L'hebdo de MAIjin (gratuit, en commentaire) 👇

14 11 0×0.9
9

Openai

Post LinkedIn

Image

AI economics finally revealed… Microsoft shot first. GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing on June 1. Pay-per-token replaces the flat subscription. Mario Rodriguez, Chief Product Officer, frames it as “alignment with usage”. Which makes sense: the flat-fee model was unsustainable. Frontier Labs have been absorbing $8 to $13 of cost for every dollar of revenue! Every question, clarification, silly picture or AI cat video has been subsidised by investor money, by a factor of ten. That’s why OpenAI decided to shutdown it’s AI video service Sora and cancelled its $1B licensing deal with Disney (who was caught by surprise in the process). AI pricing matters. As enterprises are pressured to adopt AI, they are building business cases and ROI models on subsidised economics that will not hold. Here is what is at stake: → Token Economics. Token consumption has scaled faster than price-per-token has fallen. Until now, asking the same question three times cost the same as asking it once, so variable and error-prone outputs were tolerated. Once each retry costs money, user tolerance for hallucinations will seriously diminish. Are the AI labs ready for the backlash? → Policy. In March, the US Department of War designated Anthropic a supply chain risk. The first time this designation has been applied to an American company. Defense contractors now have a countdown to remove Claude from covered workflows, regardless of technical fit. Anthropic is challenging it in court, but it sets a precedent. A sovereign model can become a prohibited dependency. → Enforcement. Last month, Anthropic's automated systems shut down 60 seats at a Latin American fintech (Belo) via a single email citing vague "Usage Policy" violations. No advance notice. The only escalation path was a Google Form. Access was restored days later as a false positive. For those days, all the company's AI-augmented workflows were down. Business continuity plans need to provision for these scenarios. Vendor concentration risk and the weak economics of frontier models are exposing companies to major disruptions. Diverging regulations only widen the uncertainty. Interestingly, China has been forced into a different posture. DeepSeek, Qwen, FP8 training, sparse activation (30 to 50% compute reduction at competitive performance). Constraint (restricted access to chips and energy) has forced architectural innovation. Narrow or Frugal AI is not a sustainability argument but an operational and economical one. Lighter models for narrow tasks. Edge inference where latency matters. Open weights where dependency becomes a business risk. For a deep dive on AI economics and how the US vs China are approaching the race to AI leadership, read my last piece on KoncentriK: link in comments. As the labs race to AGI, enterprises should build optionality as resilience and price AI projects on their real economics. Credits: Photo by Shamin Haky on Unsplash

read my last piece on KoncentriK: link in comments.

32 10 0×0.9
12

Openai

Post LinkedIn

Image

MIT just nuked the cost of every $240,000 AI degree. The architects of OpenAI, DeepMind, & Anthropic all mastered these books. Now they're free. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘆. The AI Divide isn’t coming. It’s already here. And the market is splitting fast.  1. The leaders who wait for a "Guide."  → First to be automated  2. The leaders who master the "Structure."  → Building the $1B systems For decades, the blueprints behind $1B AI companies and the $500K executive roles were hidden behind a $240,000 tuition wall  at MIT and Stanford. Today, those gates are open. The same books that shaped  • OpenAI's architects  • NVIDIA's ML leads  • Every $500K+ AI executive Now downloadable. Today. Free. But here’s the part no one tells you: Free killed the excuse. The cost is discipline. This is the 𝗘𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗦𝘆𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗯𝘂𝘀 for the next 5 years of your career. PHASE 1: 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗛𝗜𝗧𝗘𝗖𝗧’𝗦 𝗙𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 Learn the physics before you touch the controls. 1️⃣ Foundations of Machine Learning The physics of AI. The core algorithms behind every LLM. 2️⃣ Understanding Deep Learning The visual manual. See how neural networks actually work. 3️⃣ Machine Learning Systems The architect’s guide to production systems that don’t break. 4️⃣ Probabilistic Machine Learning (Part 1) The math of uncertainty. Why intelligence is never deterministic. PHASE 2: 𝗔𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗖 𝗦𝗬𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗠𝗦 Where models turn into decision-makers. 5️⃣ Algorithms for Decision Making How agents choose actions under uncertainty. 6️⃣ Reinforcement Learning (Sutton & Barto) The definitive guide to learning through reward and feedback. 7️⃣ Deep Learning (Goodfellow, Bengio) The mathematical backbone of modern AI. 8️⃣ Distributional Reinforcement Learning Beyond averages. Modeling risk, variance, and worst cases. PHASE 3: 𝗘𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗖𝗦 & 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗘𝗥 When scale meets responsibility. 9️⃣ Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning How agents cooperate, compete, and coordinate. 🔟 Agents in the Long Game of AI Game theory for long-horizon, high-stakes decisions. BONUS: Fairness and Machine Learning The practical toolkit for responsible, deployable AI. (Direct links to the full books are in the comments ⬇️) 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗥𝗨𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗛 • MIT EECS degree: $240k • NVIDIA lead engineer: $450K/year • AI strategy consultants: $10K/day You’re already paying for this knowledge. Just in lost leverage. 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗖𝗞 By 2027, they may not ask where you studied. They’ll ask what you deployed. The barrier isn’t access. It’s 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲. MIT removed the gatekeepers. Ambition is the only filter left. Share this with the leader who is done with "AI Hype" and ready for "AI Power." Save 💾 React 👍 Share ♻️ Follow 🔔 Thanks to Ved Vekhande for the list.

(Direct links to the full books are in the comments ⬇️)

107 57 0×0.6
13

Openai

Post LinkedIn

Image

Last month, I tested 5 AIs for account research. This month, I added GPT-5 Thinking and Opus 4.1 to the test. Here's what happened. My problem: Customer needs account intel on companies with minimal public data. Which AI actually delivers? My experiment: - 1 target account: Windsurf (AI-native IDE, ~80 sales reps) - 1 use case: If I were a rep for Clay - Same prompt → 6 models 6 AI models: 🤖 ChatGPT Plus (GPT-5 Thinking) 🤖 ChatGPT Plus (o3 model) 🤖 Grok 4 🤖 Claude Pro (Opus 4.1) 🤖 Perplexity Pro 🤖 Gemini 2.5 Pro Each model got the exact same detailed prompt: Research Windsurf, find specific pain points indicating they'd benefit from Clay. My Ranking Methodology: ✅ Reasoning - Can it connect dots between data points? ✅ Web Access - How deep does it dig for insights? ✅ Additional Context - Does it surface relevant info I didn't ask for? ❌ Hallucination - Makes stuff up? The verdict: 🥇 GPT-5 Thinking: 9/10 - New champion 🥈 ChatGPT o3: 7/10 - Speed king 🥉 Claude 4.1: 5/10 - No improvement 🥉 Perplexity: 5/10 - Limited ⚠️ Grok 4: 2/10 - Don't bother ❌ Gemini 2.5 Pro: 0/10 - 3 hallucinations 3 surprises from yesterday's tests: - Gemini = hallucination machine (3 fake facts in 2 tests, proceed with caution) - GPT-5 Thinking finally stable (was inconsistent at launch, now consistently crushing it) - o3 feels nerfed (less powerful than my last test - did OpenAI throttle it?) -- What's your go-to for account research? -- Drop a "👨‍🍳" for the full breakdown + video (paid subs get my battle-tested prompt).

Drop a "👨‍🍳" for the full breakdown + video

27 30 0×0.6
14

Openai

Post LinkedIn

Texte

These AI agents turn n8n, Relevance AI, or Make into your full GTM team (16 AI Agents for GTM) You can now automate lead qualification, copy generation, and intent scoring with specific prompts. Each agent handles one GTM function and runs independently on your automation platform. The system includes setup guides for connecting AI models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama) to all 3 platforms. Here's the full agent library: ➔ Viral LinkedIn Post Writer that uses 13+ hook frameworks paired with First Line Writer that gets 32% response rates. ➔ Case Study Matcher that selects by industry and size paired with Industry Personalizer that adapts templates. ➔ Voice Note Script Generator with 35%+ reply rates paired with Pain Point Identifier that finds primary and secondary pains. ➔ ICP Qualifier with 94% accuracy paired with SaaS Company Validator that identifies actual SaaS vs agencies. ➔ Tech Stack Detector that identifies tools used paired with Company Name Cleaner that removes corporate suffixes. ➔ TAM Account Scorer with weighted 1-100 scoring paired with Account Fit Scorer for quick PASS/FAIL decisions. ➔ Intent Signal Ranker with 1-10 scoring paired with Tier Assigner that segments Dream 150 down to Tier 3. ➔ Champion Identifier that finds internal champions paired with Buying Stage Detector that maps Unaware to Decision stages. This is the most complete GTM agent library I've seen. You can now run 16 specific GTM functions with platform setup guides for n8n, Relevance AI, and Make. Want it? ➔ Comment "AGENTS" ➔ Connect with me so I can send you the full library (we can only DM if we're connected) BONUS: Repost this and I'll also send you n8n workflow templates for lead scoring pipelines

➔ Comment "AGENTS" ➔ Connect with me so I can send you the full library (we can only DM if we're connected)

43 63 0×0.6

Et toi, tu livres encore tes lead magnets à la main ?

LinkMagnet envoie ta ressource en DM à chaque commentateur, automatiquement, en moins de 10 minutes.

[Toutes les niches]

Explore d'autres niches

LinkHub

LinkHub

Attire des clients qualifiés sur LinkedIn avec tes commentaires

LinkPost

LinkPost

Crée du contenu viral sur LinkedIn de façon scientifique

LinkEarn

LinkEarn

Attire des clients en illimité grâce à LinkedIn - sans y passer des heures.

LinkMagnet

LinkMagnet

Distribue tes lead magnets automatiquement sur LinkedIn